Web Security: Exceptions for Content Filter Overriding
The "bypass blocking" is a very useful feature, but it could represent a lack of security because admin cannot choose which url category cannot be bypassed.
For example, I don't like that my users can bypass content filtering for Illegal Software, Anonymizers and Malicious sites, but I can accept that they can bypass "Incidental Nudity" (a category that in some cases may be incorrect).
Current - A user listed in Bypass Users is able to bypass any site for which Unblock URL button is enabled.
Desired - A user listed in Bypass Users is able to bypass SPECIFIC sites for which Unblock URL button is enabled.
Rationale - Certain users need to access certain sites which should otherwise be blocked. However, adding them to the Bypass Users group allows them access to ANY blocked sites, which is too much power.
It would be great if your excellent feature "unblock url" could be disallowed for some categories. I dont mind letting them override the filter, but not for specific category (ie. Pornography).
In version 9.2 we added the 'Warn' option for policy. This allows users to proceed to certain categories after receiving a warning page. It's similar to the override feature, except that it doesn't require username and password.
Does this solve your problem? WIth 'Warn', you can set up policy so that 'questionable' categories that are OK to override get a warning, and you can disable the 'override' feature altogether, so that the 'Block' policy for completely unacceptable categories is always enforced...
i have been trying to load youtube to play an educational video but since youtube is blocked by your filter, i cannot show my fellow hpac members this video. I am a tenth grader running for president of my group and this affects my election.