Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!
Header Image

I suggest you ...

Networking: VLAN and LAN on the same Interface

It is useful to have LAN(default) and VLAN on the same Interface, so you can have one uplink from your switch, at this time you need 2 cables to connect your switch.

160 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Timm SchneiderTimm Schneider shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeremy WelserJeremy Welser shared a merged idea: Network: VLAN as Additional Address  ·   · 

    6 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • TonyTony commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Seriously???? What in the world are you guys at sophos thinking??? This is a NETWORKING appliance. It can't even handle a default tagged/untagged vlan? Please, let's just start with the basics and then try the advanced stuff.

      • Marcus HockMarcus Hock commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hi, isn't this what is the common us of a native VLAN? In respect of 802.1q, every VLAN-Trunk should be able to deal with one native (untagged) VLAN. I am really curious why sophos does not implement the correct standard?!

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        In my optionion, the thinking of this is to different between extern and internal traffic. Over this way, users are coerced to difference beween internal and external traffic.

      • Jay StoeberJay Stoeber commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I agree, and the reasons that I can think of would be multiples.
        1. Those of us using the appliances, cannot add NICs for additional subnets, and this this would be essential to say, segregate VoIP or SAN traffic as but one example;
        2. Those of us who do use a regular server(s) for our ASG, still run into physical capacity issues (lack of PCI slots) in addition to being limited to basically 4 ports per internal PCI network multiport adapters - not that larger ones are not available, but their cost gets exponential as the # increases per adapter);
        3. Many of us do not have multiple routers on our network, and in our case, only ASG is our LAN router as it were, and throwing money into a routing switch or another router on small LANs is just not a good idea, much less affordable. So, VLANs are the typical answer to achieve a new network, without too much complexity - our router (ASG) just needs a simpler way to do this for us, and this ability would likely be the answer;

      Feedback and Knowledge Base